<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poker = Game of Skill &#8211; PA Judge Rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fuzionpoker.com/news/poker-game-of-skill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fuzionpoker.com/news/poker-game-of-skill/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 10:51:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: James Kirtley</title>
		<link>http://www.fuzionpoker.com/news/poker-game-of-skill/comment-page-1/#comment-6873</link>
		<dc:creator>James Kirtley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 04:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuzionpoker.com/?p=618#comment-6873</guid>
		<description>I appreciate this blogs content and it is more powerful for poker lovers including me. I love to play online poker game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate this blogs content and it is more powerful for poker lovers including me. I love to play online poker game.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beginning of Enlightenment in Poker? - Poker Forum Canada</title>
		<link>http://www.fuzionpoker.com/news/poker-game-of-skill/comment-page-1/#comment-6866</link>
		<dc:creator>Beginning of Enlightenment in Poker? - Poker Forum Canada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuzionpoker.com/?p=618#comment-6866</guid>
		<description>[...] was a similar ruling in PA about a month ago... I think they are using that case as a precedence for the others.    [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was a similar ruling in PA about a month ago&#8230; I think they are using that case as a precedence for the others.    [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
